Knowledge Sharing Workshop – 3

IMG_20170119_170249

All participants that attended the third Orchid Project knowledge sharing workshop

We held our third Knowledge Sharing Workshop from 17th to 19th January 2017 in Narok, Kenya. The workshop was facilitated by Lucy Walker, our Programmes Manager, Cess Mugo, Programme Manager at Education Centre for the Advancement of Women (ECAW), Orchid Project’s partner, and Kathryn Newell-Jones, Consultant in global education, research and training.

The Knowledge Sharing Workshop convened 15 people working with 7 organisations across Kenya to come together and share challenges, solutions and best practice in working to end female genital cutting. The organisations included the Coalition on Violence Against Women (COVAW), ECAW, Girls Education Mission (GEM), Kuria East Anti-FGM (KEA), Reach Women and Youth Development Organisation (RWAYDO), SAFE Maa and SAFE Samburu.

The workshop is based upon the ‘six elements for the abandonment of FGC’ developed by Unicef using academic theory and lessons learned from such field experiences as Tostan in Senegal and Deir el Barsha in Egypt. These six key elements can contribute to transforming the social convention of cutting girls and encourage the rapid and mass abandonment. An underlying theme is application and the workshop concluded with how learning may be adopted and used within the activities of attending organisations.

The photos below show one example of an activity used to teach each element as well as the feedback participants shared.

Element 1: Community education which is not forced or judgemental with a focus to fulfil human rights & empower girls & women

IMG_20170119_131611

Power Walk activity: volunteers started on a line in the middle of the room to represent equal power. Each participant was given an identity at random and they were asked to step forwards or backwards depending on whether they felt they had more or less power.

“Thinking about the power of the community was useful in recognising that they can make decisions to bring about change. I will apply this by ensuring meaningful participation of the community in our programme to help realise effective change” (anonymous participant)

Element 2: Dialogue and discussion that unearths the consequences of the practice and hidden opposition to it

Image 7

Participants present cultural, social and environmental factors of FGC and to what extent their organisations address these factors

Group 1 (comprising of representatives SAFE Maa, SAFE Samburu, COVAW and RWAYDO) explained that many of them were working to address cultural factors, including supporting community-led dialogue to discuss sensitive issues and developing an alternative rite of passage to maintain culture and the transition to womanhood without the cut.

Element 3: The collective choice of a group that intermarries/is closely connected with engagement of all those involved (below left image)

IMG_20170118_152902

Participants using role play to show interdependent actions

IMG_0107

Game Theory Game: to describe, understand and explain interdependent action, i.e. what one family choose to do depends on what other families choose to do.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Element 4: Enough people need to see that enough people are changing (above right image)

Group 1 shared that “the Game Theory Game was useful as it shows that it is possible to end FGC. The game starts with just three people changing and in the end the entire community is transformed due to constant dialogue facilitated by transformed change agents. We will use it in public barazas and workshops.”

Element 5: Organised diffusion to ensure the decision spreads rapidly from one community to another and is sustained

IMG_20170119_131323

Cess Mugo, co-facilitator, using role play to explain the concept of social norms

Upon reflection of the activity, one group shared that “the play showed how we can progress in bringing change to the community, emphasising that one person alone cannot stop FGC. It enables people to share experiences and continue the dialogue. It shows a better approach: go and meet leaders to discuss and then meet with the community, discuss and share. It shows the need to not just go with your own views but to ask for views on how our community can change and what alternatives there are. It also showed the need to spread the message to other communities”

Element 6: An environment that enables and supports change, designed to build on these other components

Image 4Participants made Advocacy Plans for their organisations, showing:

WHAT changes you want to happen

WHO can make those changes happen and

HOW you can convince them to make change

In small groups, participants discussed how they would define advocacy, presenting to the group what they felt advocacy was.

One example was: ‘the activities of an organisation which aim to influence decisions for better change, e.g. the First Lady of Kenya advocating on maternal health and establishing maternal clinics”

Each organisations’ plans were exhibited in the Advocacy gallery, enabling participants to learn from others.

 

IMG_20170119_102531

Kenneth, Joyce, Sarah (SAFE Maa) and George (GEM) in front of the Advocacy gallery

 

Facilitation techniques and and incorporating the 6 elements into work

IMG_20170119_125315

Benson and Kenneth (ECAW) facilitated the group in open dialogue, dividing the group into men and women to share more personal issues.

IMG_20170119_125840

The male participants discussed and delivered feedback on Benson and Kenneth’s facilitation skills

 

IMG_20170119_154806

Low Cost/No Cost activity: organisations shared things that they had to offer at no or little costs and things that they would like at no or little cost.

image 3

RWAYDO offered capacity building which was selected by COVAW. COVAW offered a day of training on Gender Based Violence which was selected by GEM.

Image 2

COVAW requested someone to develop a social network for the group which SAFE Samburu and KEA offered to do.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At the end of the workshop participants left us with some comments –

“Great opportunity for networking”; “I interacted with many different organisations” (anonymous participant)

“At the beginning I felt fearful of speaking out and now I am empowered and have the courage to speak out and do things in my community” (Lydia, KEA).

“I didn’t know I can use one minute to pass information. I have realised that people with less influence like youth have power, can make decisions and make a difference” (Shashon, SAFE Maa)